In a world full of stupid things, the only thing you can do is roll up the bottom of your pants
Thursday, December 29, 2011
The First Honest Assessment
The WaPo ran this piece which stated that the City of Baltimore doesn't expect property tax revenues to increase until 2016, which means they aren't forecasting a housing bottom until 2015. And that children comes from someone who needs to plan for the future and be honest with themselves about the course we are on, as opposed to our extend and pretend politicians or the bulk of the mainstream media whose editorial agendas have a vested interest the party who has spent several trillion dollars bailing out over extended banks and home debtors. In truth, I doubt the WaPo even understood the significance of what they printed, or I am sure that they would have framed it differently.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Oh the Bitter Irony
Democrats like to wail about Goldman Sachs' influence over the government, yet they are the prime offenders when it comes to opening the door for these blood-sucking vampire squid to help drain the financial life out of our country.
Look at all these ex-Goldman employees appointed to office over the last 20 years. All but one are Democratic appointees.
Look at all these ex-Goldman employees appointed to office over the last 20 years. All but one are Democratic appointees.
John Corzine: I Stand Corrected
So last week, I gave this clown the benifit of the doubt. My mistake. I really have to stop doing that.
Today Reuters reports that transcripts from the compliance department at MF Global clearly show that he was aware that customer funds were being used in a suspect fashion.
End of story, he's a crook and a perjurer.
Today Reuters reports that transcripts from the compliance department at MF Global clearly show that he was aware that customer funds were being used in a suspect fashion.
End of story, he's a crook and a perjurer.
Thursday, December 08, 2011
Fact Check
Continuing with my theme of incompetence today ...
While discussing the upcoming expiration of the 2% payroll tax cut the White House released the following statement...
So, I sit here pondering this statement and I can't help but wonder.
Was someone trying to deceive us? And I am sure it worked on the weak minded 99%
Was someone flat out lying to us?
Was someone just plain incompetent?
On the high side, at least the spelling and grammar were correct, but then again Microsoft Word is pretty good at correcting those kinds of things. Its shame it doesn't work on the truth.
Because any of these circumstances should disqualify someone from working for the President of the United States or most other employers. Can someone perhaps offer an alternate reason why millions of soft minded Americans were sent these untruths?
While discussing the upcoming expiration of the 2% payroll tax cut the White House released the following statement...
It's simple. If lawmakers don't vote to extend the payroll tax cut, taxes for 160 million Americans will go up on January 1st.A couple of things stood out. First off, 160 million American workers is a BS number that somebody pulled out of thin air, because the BLS only claims about 140 million American workers currently employed. So, certainly there aren't 160 million middle class workers out there. $1500 is the maximum benefit from this break, so there is no chance the average American worker who makes $50,000 is receiving $1500. The number is less than $1000.
President Obama just left the press briefing room at the White House where he called on Congress to extend the tax cut, pay for it responsibly, and expand it so middle class families get a $1,500 break next year.
He told Congress to put country before party and stop wasting time.
Every day, folks are fighting to make ends meet and businesses are working to keep their doors open. The longer Congress waits to extend the payroll tax cut, the more uncertainty it creates for ordinary Americans. So we've put a clock on every page of the White House website, counting down the days, hours, and minutes until taxes for the middle class increase. In the briefing room, where the President just spoke, that same clock is ticking down as well.
And to make sure you have the information you need to know exactly what this means for your family, we've put together a calculator to show how much of your money hangs in the balance.
This calculator illustrates for you what nearly every independent economist has said: letting this tax cut expire will be a blow to the economy. We can’t let that happen. Now is the time to make a real difference in the lives of the people who sent us here.
Check it out and pass it along:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/taxcut
Thanks,
David Plouffe
Senior Advisor to the President
So, I sit here pondering this statement and I can't help but wonder.
Was someone trying to deceive us? And I am sure it worked on the weak minded 99%
Was someone flat out lying to us?
Was someone just plain incompetent?
On the high side, at least the spelling and grammar were correct, but then again Microsoft Word is pretty good at correcting those kinds of things. Its shame it doesn't work on the truth.
Because any of these circumstances should disqualify someone from working for the President of the United States or most other employers. Can someone perhaps offer an alternate reason why millions of soft minded Americans were sent these untruths?
John Corzine: I Buy Your Story
So today, John Corzine broke his silence and stated that he was shocked that multiple hundreds of millions of dollars were missing. And you know what, I buy it. Its a believeable story.
What I find unbelievable, and quite frankly negligent is this; Why was this ultra experienced senior executive running his firm with such weak compliance and monitoring of trading and accounting? Especially with the history of such scandals over the last decade or so. Remember Barings Bank and Nick Leeson or Jérôme Kerviel and Société Générale. These are repeated failures of compliance and monitoring which have resulted in multiple billions of dollars lost because nobody was watching the till.
In short, I don't necessarily think John Corzine is a crook, but rather an incompotent CEO. At least until proved otherwise.
What I find unbelievable, and quite frankly negligent is this; Why was this ultra experienced senior executive running his firm with such weak compliance and monitoring of trading and accounting? Especially with the history of such scandals over the last decade or so. Remember Barings Bank and Nick Leeson or Jérôme Kerviel and Société Générale. These are repeated failures of compliance and monitoring which have resulted in multiple billions of dollars lost because nobody was watching the till.
In short, I don't necessarily think John Corzine is a crook, but rather an incompotent CEO. At least until proved otherwise.
Thursday, December 01, 2011
Adam Carolla is Spot on WRT OWS
Warning : The language is not safe for work, so please exercise some judgement as to where you play this video and for whom you play this video.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)